Feedback on the Draft Report

While most students followed the suggested report template and included the relevant parts, there is still work to do to improve your reports from the viewpoint of content, writing style and layout. Here are some general comments about different aspects that need development for your final report.

1. Content: From a broad point of view, many reports lacked substance. The aim was to research a general problem from one of the two scenarios (such as web site design) and then apply it to a specific example in a company that you know. Many students wrote as if they were experts and, despite having some good references, did not make the connection in their analysis or comments, to support or substantiate their findings. For example, if you were looking at the aspect of usability, cultural appropriateness, colour, navigation etc, you needed to firstly paraphrase and then cite what the research says about these aspects. After that, make your observations to illustrate how the website that you are talking about fits/doesn't fit these principles. Be specific: don't just say "the website is not usable" or "the navigation was poor", you need to say why. Citing your sources (which should be listed in full in your bibliography) when you discuss the pros and cons of your observations, shows that you are not just writing off the top of your head, but are making informed analysis based on research.

2. Parts of the report: This was mostly done well, although here are a few things that could be improved.